PandoraSEAL - Testing and Verification Questionnaire
Information and consent
Before responding to the questionnaire, please, make sure you follow the set of test cases/scenarios given below, which will guide you to cover the functionality of the PandoraSEAL Platform:
• Login to the platform.
• Change your password through your account .
• Logout from the platform and confirm.
• Navigate through the data and change the countries to see their latest reporter data.
• Create a new forecasting model by selecting the countries to be considered
• Create few new NPI Plans, by selecting the measures to be considered and their strictness.
• Use the trained models and combinations of the created NPI profiles to perform forecasts and navigate through the results.
Also note: the scale adopted in the questionnaire is: 1 = Poor, 2 = Good, 3 = Very Good, 4 = Excellent. No answer means that the specific statement/question is not applicable to your tests. In some cases the wording poor…excellent may not fit exactly; in those cases, please, consider it as level of agreement to the statement, level of satisfaction, etc., with 1 remaining the lowest and 4 remaining the highest score.
Consent: *
Yes | No | |
---|---|---|
I provide my explicit consent for my participation in the testing excersise of the PandoraSEAL Platform (result of the Control4Covid Project) and for the subsequent processing of the data and information I provide, in accordance with the project's research protocol: |
Testing and verification feedback
1. Functional suitability (Degree to which the system/product/module provides functions that meet the stated and implied needs when used under the pre-specified conditions) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The provided functionality is complete and covers all the specified user objectives | ||||
The provided functionality is appropriate and facilitate the accomplishment of the specified user objectives |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
2. Reliability (Degree to which a system, product or component performs specified functions under specified conditions for a specified period of time) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The system and its functionalities were available and operational when I was going through the test cases. | ||||
The functionality is mature and is executed reliably |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
3. Usability (Degree to which a product or system can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a specified context of use) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
My impression when going through the test cases is positive and I could recognise the functions and their appropriateness. | ||||
It was rather easy for me to understand what I should do in order to accomplish the task at hand. | ||||
It was easy for me to operate the system | ||||
I was able to understand and I felt good with the visualisation of the functionality and the results of my actions in the system. | ||||
The system helped me to avoid errors while running the funcitonality. |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
4. Performance efficiency (Performance relative to the amount of resources used under stated conditions) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The system response was very good in terms of time. |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
5. Maintainability (Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with which a product or system can be modified by the intended maintainers) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
As a technical person, I can understand the components of the system and how I can modify them to respond to new requirements for improvements or bug fixes. | ||||
The system has been built in a modular way and I can modify parts of it without compromising the functionality of other parts. |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.
6. Compatibility (Degree to which a product, system or component can exchange information with other products, systems or components, and/or perform its required functions, while sharing the same hardware or software environment) *
Poor | Good | Very good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The system is able to work with the forecast model training and forecasting smoothly, without any integration issues. | ||||
The API and the integration guidelines are very clear and I can undertake the integration of additional algorithms in collaboration with the scientific team. | ||||
The algorithms (training of models and forecasts) can use the API and present meaningful results. |
Please, elaborate where you deem necessary.